Saturday, January 9, 2010

Young Hearts and Lauren Hill

Yesterday we had a review of EKGs. When discussing EKGs the cardiologist mentioned that "Young hearts may demonstrate U waves." All I could think about was asking him if young hearts beat free tonight.

A week ago a woman named Lauren Hill came to the hospital to teach as about diversity. I wanted to ask her if she was familiar with the fact that: girl you know you better watch out, some guys, some guys are only about. That thing, that thing, that thiiiing.

I'm easily distracted.

The Ambiguous Psychiatrist Sound


What do you do when your goal is to elicit as much information as possible from a patient while neither supporting nor condemning their thoughts/actions? The answer is the ambiguous psychiatrist sound.

It's somewhat hard to describe if you have never heard it firsthand, but I'll do my best.

It somewhere between "Mmmm" and "Hmmm" but it isn't just the combining of the two sounds "Mmmmhmmm" because if you aren't careful "Mmmhmm" can come off as sounding condescending or disbelieving.

Instead it is almost an impossible fusion between the two sounds. As if you could be saying both Mmm and Hmm in the very same instant. It's best used with a gutteral, breathy not to disguise any possible inferences that a patient could possibly derive from the sound. Additionally, the best psychiatrists can include an almost imperceptible rise in pitch at the end of the sound to further confuse the patient as to whether it was questioning or affirming.

It's like saying "I respectfully want to inform you that I'm listening but I want you to clarify, if you are able" but with the simplicity of one syllable. In short, it is the perfect sound in the hands of a skilled practitioner and it can work wonders on the psych ward.



Thursday, November 19, 2009

Health Care Reform: Medicine vs Surgery

Lost within the political debate over healthcare reform, is a battle currently going on within medicine itself. Although most if not all doctors agree that there needs to be significant changes to the health care system, there is significant debate as to what exacty this should entail. Before I get too far ahead of myself, let's go back to the opening salvos...



In response to this statement the American College of Surgeons released the following letter, which goes on to decry the gross exaggeration of what a surgeon makes on a given operation. In addition it states that misinformation regarding healthcare does nothing to further the debate, adn that the surgeon patient relationship could be damaged as a result. Also, interesting is the many surgical subspecialties that signed on to the letter. This was not just the American College of Surgeons (ACS), but it also included everything from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to most if not all of the surgical specialties (Urology, Orthopedics, ENT etc.).

More recently the American Medical Association (AMA) has come out in support of the current legislation that passed in the house relating to health care reform. In a letter to Speaker Pelosi, the AMA applauded many of the proposed changes that the bill would enact--specifically they stated that the bill would expand coverage, reform the insurance industry, and protect patient-physician decision making.

Not long afterwards the ACS shot back with this letter to the senate, cosigned by 21 other specialty organizations. It rebutted several of the points made by the AMA and focused on several key issues that it had with the bill.

Additionally they reaffirmed the need for Tort reform in this statement:
CHICAGO: The American College of Surgeons applauds Democrats – led by House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) – for recognizing the need for Congress to address medical liability reform as part of the overall health care reform bill currently under consideration. Over the past few weeks, we have been encouraged to have heard Democrats and Republicans across the country talking with constituents at town hall meetings about the need to address this important bipartisan issue.

The current climate in this country is one in which surgeons and other physicians are forced to practice in an environment of defensive medicine, sometimes ordering additional and possibly unnecessary tests in order to avoid lawsuits. Addressing medical liability reform as part of the overall health care reform bill will help to stem the tide of rising health care costs.

The American College of Surgeons urges President Obama to make medical liability reform a more central component of his call for overall health care reform. Further, we urge the leadership of both the House of Representatives and the Senate to include this important issue in the bills that they will take up in the coming weeks.


Here is President Obama speaking to the AMA regarding Tort reform.


Recently, the ACS has released a side by side chart of the House and Senate bills, along with what they view as some of the drawbacks.

The battle lines seem to have been drawn, with the AMA standing with the president and the majority of the Democrats (except Tort reform), while the ACS and most Republicans stand in opposition (although both groups support repealing the Sustainable Growth Rate provision--something opposed be most Republicans and some Democrats). It's interesting to me how this has happened, I wonder if the average surgeon would describe themselves as being right-leaning politically and the average medicine doctor would say they are left-leaning, or whether this is just how the chips fell in this one instance.

Monday, November 16, 2009

Surgery - The Start of Third Year (Part 1)


After two days of ortientation both to the hospital and the surgury rotation in general we were finally able to start getting our hands dirty learning the basics of general surgery. I was both extremely nervous and very excited, nervous that I would make some glaring mistake, nervous that I would ask stupid questions and be thought of as a student not deserving of the trust that was placed in me, nervous that I would not be able handle the long hours associated with the surgical rotation, but most of all just nervous that maybe I was not going to be able to cut it as a clinical medical student. At the same time I was also very...

Excited. Excited that I never again would spend days on end studying for a (mostly worthless) biochemistry test. Elated that I was now going to be working with real patients. Overjoyed that I was going to play some small role on a team that was working to help heal patients. Needless to say it was a time marked by dramatic mood swings.

Before I get too far, I should give a little more background.

The surgical rotation that I am on does mostly common general surgical procedures, for instance gall bladder removals, appendectomies, thyroid and parathyroid surgeries, some melanoma removal and emergent surgical cases.

The service that I am on is specifically a trauma service, so over the course of the next 6 weeks I'll be helping to take care of a lot of patients who have been in a car accident, or fallen and broken bones, or patients that require an emergency appendectomy or other urgent procedure.

I found all this out during the first two days of orientation, but nothing that they tell you during orientation could prepare you for the experiences and emotions that you will feel as you walk into the hospital on your first day of work.

Immediately I met the chief of the service--for the unindoctrinated, the chief of the service is a doctor who is in the final year of their residency, in general surgery this means that they have been out of medical school for 5 years. In my situation the chief resident had been a doctor for 6 years as she had taken a year to do a fellowship in critical care.

Also on the trauma team was a first year resident, aka an intern. At many hospitals, about half of the interns are on a track to become general surgeons while the other half are either in a year-long "preliminary surgery" program or are in a "transition year". For the most part, those in those in the "preliminary surgery" program are either US or international students that didn't match into the surgical specialty they wanted to (ortho, ENT, general surgery, etc). Students in a transition year have already been accepted into other programs, but as part of their training they rotate through different specialties for their first year. For the first month we had a transition year student who was accepted into the Radiation Oncology program, and the second month we had a Preliminary Surgery resident.

I was very fortunate in that I was on a relatively small team for my surgery rotation. In other hospitals, 4 medical students would be assigned to teams of 10 residents. The major difference between our 3 person team and the larger teams seen at other hospitals was the lack of mid-level residents on our team. In other words the 10 person team would have a number of 2nd, 3rd, and 4th year residents sharing the workload. The downside to a small team is that when there are 40 patients on the rounding list for a Saturday you only have the three of you to see them all. The upside is that many times in the OR it was just me, the attending and the chief resident doing a case. Which for me was the most interesting.

Saturday, July 11, 2009

Start of a New Chapter

A week ago I started a new chapter in my medical life; 3rd year rotations. It has been a huge adjustment, but a very fulfilling one at the same time. No more speding days on end with my nose buried in a book. From now on the majority of my learning will be hands on.

When I have the time I'm going to be writing about the experiences that I have while on rotations so that I can someday look back and remember what it felt like to be just starting out.

For my first two months I am rotating through surgery (which I first saw as a curse but am now really enjoying) at one of the busiest surgical centers in the country (in terms of # of surgeries at this hospitals three sites).

Friday, June 5, 2009

Drag Me to USMLE Step 1

I'm stuck in a never-ending Step 1 studying, phase of life, I'll post some more once I emerge.

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Secrets of Happiness


A Harvard study of which has been running from the 1960s to the present found that there were seven characteristics common to the happiest of the men studied. The characteristics were: mature adaptations (chosing altruism, humor etc in response to difficult situations), education, stable marriage, not smoking, not abusing alcohol, some exercise, and healthy weight.


The complete article can be found here.
Here is an exerpt from the article taken from The Atlantic:


What happened to you?


You grew up in a kind of fairy tale, in a big-city brownstone with 11 rooms and three baths. Your father practiced medicine and made a mint. When you were a college sophomore, you described him as thoughtful, funny, and patient. “Once in awhile his children get his goat,” you wrote, “but he never gets sore without a cause.” Your mother painted and served on prominent boards. You called her “artistic” and civic-minded.


As a child, you played all the sports, were good to your two sisters, and loved church. You and some other boys from Sunday school—it met at your house—used to study the families in your neighborhood, choosing one every year to present with Christmas baskets. When the garbageman’s wife found out you had polio, she cried. But you recovered fully, that was your way. “I could discover no problems of importance,” the study’s social worker concluded after seeing your family. “The atmosphere of the home is one of happiness and harmony.”


At Harvard, you continued to shine. “Perhaps more than any other boy who has been in the Grant Study,” the staff noted about you, “the following participant exemplifies the qualities of a superior personality: stability, intelligence, good judgment, health, high purpose, and ideals.” Basically, they were in a swoon. They described you as especially likely to achieve “both external and internal satisfactions.” And you seemed well on your way. After a stint in the Air Force—“the whole thing was like a game,” you said—you studied for work in a helping profession. “Our lives are like the talents in the parable of the three stewards,” you wrote. “It is something that has been given to us for the time being and we have the opportunity and privilege of doing our best with this precious gift.”


And then what happened? You married, and took a posting overseas. You started smoking and drinking. In 1951—you were 31—you wrote, “I think the most important element that has emerged in my own psychic picture is a fuller realization of my own hostilities. In early years I used to pride myself on not having any. This was probably because they were too deeply buried and I unwilling and afraid to face them.” By your mid-30s, you had basically dropped out of sight. You stopped returning questionnaires. “Please, please … let us hear from you,” Dr. Vaillant wrote you in 1967. You wrote to say you’d come see him in Cambridge, and that you’d return the last survey, but the next thing the study heard of you, you had died of a sudden disease.


Dr. Vaillant tracked down your therapist. You seemed unable to grow up, the therapist said. You had an affair with a girl he considered psychotic. You looked steadily more disheveled. You had come to see your father as overpowering and distant, your mother as overbearing. She made you feel like a black sheep in your illustrious family. Your parents had split up, it turns out.


In your last days, you “could not settle down,” a friend told Dr. Vaillant. You “just sort of wandered,” sometimes offering ad hoc therapy groups, often sitting in peace protests. You broke out spontaneously into Greek and Latin poetry. You lived on a houseboat. You smoked dope. But you still had a beautiful sense of humor. “One of the most perplexing and charming people I have ever met in my life,” your friend said. Your obituary made you sound like a hell of a man—a war hero, a peace activist, a baseball fan.

Monday, May 11, 2009

Don’t!

Here's an interesting article on delayed gratification, something I'm sure most medical and pre-med students are all too aware of:

Dept. of Science: Don’t!: Reporting & Essays: The New Yorker

Thursday, May 7, 2009

Valuable Orthopedic Websites

Here are a couple of valuable websites that I've looked at:

Orthopedic basics from the AAOS:
http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/topic.cfm?topic=A00274&return_link=0

A listing of all orthopedic programs in the US:
http://www.orthosurg.net/orthopedic-residency/programs.asp

A site of everything otheropedics, that I haven't used much myself but that other's have recommended:
http://www.orthogate.org/

Questions to Ask While Interviewing for Orthopedic Residencies

A little preparation can go a long way to showing your interest, this was provided by one of the fourth year students:


General Questions
What is the structure of didactic curriculum?
Is there time allotted for electives?
Do the residents have a high operative volume?
How busy is the ER? Level 1 trauma center? What types of trauma?
Do residents attend national conferences? Is it funded?
Where do the graduating residents go?

Questions for Residents
What are the strengths/weaknesses?
Did you ever consider leaving the program?
How many facilities do you cover? How do you like that? A lot of driving? Any required rotations in different cities?
Do fellows take away from learning experience?
What is call schedule like? How are the call rooms? Do you sleep while on call?
Do you have ample time to read?
How is the balance between autonomy and supervision?
How is ancillary staff? Are they helpful and pleasant to work with?
Is there a lot of scut work?
How is your relationship with the staff?
How do the residents get along? Do you hang-out outside of work? Are there any sports teams that you play on?
Do the residents get along with other residents in the hospital?
How do you like the city?
How are the benefits? Parking? Meals paid for?
Do you have moonlighting opportunities?

Questions for Chairman/PD/Attendings
What are your plans for the future?
How do you see the program changing in size or structure over the next five years?
How long have you been here? Do you plan on staying at this program for the next 5 years?
What is the status of the programs accreditation?
How highly do you emphasize resident education?
How do you feel the relationship is between the staff and the residents?
What are the research opportunities like? Is it required? How is it funded?
How are the residents evaluated?
How do the residents perform on OITE? Boards?
What do you look for in a candidate? How many people do you rank?