Learning vs. Studying

Are learning and studying the same?

Most people that are in medical school have probably had a conversation that goes something like this.

Non-Medical Student: "You're in medical school! You must love school, I could never put up with four more years of it"

You (or Me): "Well I don't know, I don't really think that I love schooling all that much..."

If you are anything like me, you probably find it really hard to give someone a satisfying answer to that question. I've thought about my own motivations a lot, and this is what I've been able to come up with.

I love learning. I love finding out something new that I think is applicable to my life (or to my future life). I love when I finally understand something, when I spend time trying to wrap my mind around something and then I finally "get it."

I hate studying. I hate being told to read 200 pages of notes and commit it to memory. I hate sitting down in a lecture hall for 5 hours of lectures followed by 3 hours of lab. For me at least, there is nothing fun about that.

I'd love to learn another language, or how to play a musical instrument--or even another sport--but the medical school curiculum is so constrained that there is no time for that. So what you end up with is a bunch of people who are (on some levels) miserable for the better part of two years with one test after another hanging over their heads.

I agree that much of the information learned in medical school is very valuable, but I think that there are much more efficient (and less costly) ways of training our future doctors.

So how would I change medical school to make it better.

The biggest change I would make is to switch to a 3 year preceptorship, broken down like this:

First year: anatomy, histology, physiology (6 months) pathology, pharmacology, microbiology (6 months)

Second-Third Year: 6 months of family practice at 2 different sites, 4 months of internal medicine, 4 months of general surgery. 1 month of Emergency Medicine, OB/GYN, Psychiatry, etc.

Fourth year: 8 months of required electives, 4 months for interviewing etc.

In this system you would have to expand the "shelf" tests to account for longer periods in each rotation, but I feel like this would be a better situation for everyone.

Current doctors can feel like they are having a greater influence on future doctors. Medical students will absorb much more information when facts are associated with real life situations. Patients will have better trained doctors, and hospitals can hire a few less MAs and save some money. In my mind, it seems like medical education is stuck in the dark ages--where medical students are still being taught to memorize side effects for 100s of drugs, even though that information is now only a PDA click away.

Wouldn't that time be better served learning how to be a better doctor instead of a fact-spitter-outer. How many times have you heard from doctors that many of their colleagues in medical school who were great students have made terrible doctors--isn't that a sign that something needs fixing?